Skip to main content
This forum is closed to new posts and responses. Individual names altered for privacy purposes. The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a forum for customer support requests. Any customer support requests should be directed to the official HCL customer support channels below:

HCL Software Customer Support Portal for U.S. Federal Government clients
HCL Software Customer Support Portal

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum


  

PreviousPrevious NextNext

RE: Preventing access to a local replica
~Umberto Nongeroson 6.Jan.04 08:08 PM a Web browser
Notes Client All Releases All Platforms


There's no direct way to do what you're asking for here. If a local system is not in touch with the server, it has no way to tell whether the userid is still authorized on the server. I assume you do want your sales force to be able to use disconnected local replicas on the road.

You could, however, do things to make a local replica extremely difficult to use after some period of time has elapsed without replication. Write an agent that daily updates some special document. Choose a cutoff, say 4 weeks. Add code to the database Postopen event to see whether this is a local replica and to check the last modified time of this special document. If it hasn't been updated in the last 4 weeks, hard delete all the documents in the database (or use an API function to set the replication cutoff to zero days, making all the documents vanish without leaving pesky deletion stubs. Or delete the database itself).

Or you could employ a password locked system. Have a secret algorithm in the database to generate an access password which changes every week. Have an agent email next week's password to each authorized user weekly. On database open, challenge for the password. If they don't get it, kick 'em out.




Preventing access to a local replic... (~Bella Opveluin... 6.Jan.04)
. . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Hank Quetamarn... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Bella Opveluin... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Hank Quetamarn... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Bella Opveluin... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Bella Opveluin... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Tate Quetgerob... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Jan.04)
. . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Bill Frokimari... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . I think this is way to easy to get ... (~Dan Elhipister... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . . . RE: I think this is way to easy to ... (~Holly Minjipyb... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Bella Opveluin... 6.Jan.04)
. . It really can't be done. Even using... (~Dan Elhipister... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Bella Opveluin... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Naomi Deskrote... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Bella Opveluin... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Tate Quetgerob... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Bill Frokimari... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Hal Zenrekonyl... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: It really can't be done. Even u... (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Jan.04)
. . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Phil Elkrochek... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . Re: Preventing access to a local re... (~Sanjay Quettum... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . RE: Re: Preventing access to a loca... (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Jan.04)
. . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Tate Quetgerob... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Bella Opveluin... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Tate Quetgerob... 6.Jan.04)
. . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Paul Elkrochek... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Hal Zenrekonyl... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . And can't you accept that there is ... (~Dan Elhipister... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . RE: And can't you accept that there... (~Paul Elkrochek... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Tate Quetgerob... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Paul Elkrochek... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Delores Dwonic... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Paul Elkrochek... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Preventing access to a local re... (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . Telling people that there IS no bes... (~Yentl Quetkrot... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Telling people that there IS no... (~Bill Frokimari... 7.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Once again... (~Paul Elkrochek... 8.Jan.04)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not losing sight of it, just disagr... (~Yentl Quetkrot... 8.Jan.04)
. . You can't stop someone taking the d... (~Vijay Churesas... 14.Jan.04)
. . . . *These are very good points eom> (~Yentl Quetkrot... 14.Jan.04)


Document Options






  Document options
Print this pagePrint this page

Search this forum

Forum views and search


  Forum views and search
Date (threaded)
Date (flat)
With excerpt
Category
Platform
Release
Advanced search

Member Tools


RSS Feeds

 RSS feedsRSS
All forum posts RSS
All main topics RSS